↓ Skip to main content

One-pot, three-component, sequential Michael-Michael-ring-closure reactions. Annulation of meta-dicarboxylated aromatic rings. Total synthesis of juncunol

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Chemical Sciences, April 1988
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#41 of 264)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
One-pot, three-component, sequential Michael-Michael-ring-closure reactions. Annulation of meta-dicarboxylated aromatic rings. Total synthesis of juncunol
Published in
Journal of Chemical Sciences, April 1988
DOI 10.1007/bf02839442
Authors

Gary H. Posner, Karen A. Canella, Ernest F. Silversmith

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2018.
All research outputs
#8,537,346
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Chemical Sciences
#41
of 264 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,644
of 12,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Chemical Sciences
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 264 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 12,482 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them