| Title |
Intraoperatives Neuromonitoring in der rekonstruktiven Halswirbelsäulenchirurgie
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Die Orthopädie, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00132-018-3567-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
E. Shiban, B. Meyer |
| Abstract |
Correction of cervical deformity is associated with a considerable risk of neurological deterioration. The use of intraoperative neuromonitoring (IOM) can, however, significantly increase patient safety. Nonetheless, data on the effectiveness of IOM during reconstructive cervical surgery are very limited. Since the surgical maneuvers in reconstructive cervical surgery represent the same dangers to the spinal cord as in scoliosis correction, the same influence of IOM on the clinical outcome may be assumed. IOM has been shown to decrease the rate of neurological complications in scoliosis surgery. Herein, we discuss the current evidence for the efficacy of IOM during reconstructive cervical surgery as well as during scoliosis surgery. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 40% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 40% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2018.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Die Orthopädie
#276
of 678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#303,342
of 343,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Die Orthopädie
#9
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 678 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,387 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.