↓ Skip to main content

Vitamin D in schizophrenia, major depression and alcoholism

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neural Transmission, July 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
115 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
Title
Vitamin D in schizophrenia, major depression and alcoholism
Published in
Journal of Neural Transmission, July 2000
DOI 10.1007/s007020070063
Pubmed ID
Authors

B. Schneider, B. Weber, A. Frensch, J. Stein, J. Fritze

Abstract

25-Hydroxyvitamin D3, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3, calcium, phosphate and parathyreoidal hormone levels were assessed in 34 patients with schizophrenia (DSM-III-R, 44% female, mean age 38.9 +/- 2.1 years), 30 patients with alcohol addiction (16% female, mean age 48.7 +/- 2.2 years), 25 patients with major depression (56% female, mean age 57.6+/- years) and 31 healthy controls. Only 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 and 1,25-dihydroxvitamin D3 levels were significantly lower in all groups of psychiatric patients than in normal controls, but not phosphate, calcium and parathyreoidal hormone levels. Significant differences in the vitamin D levels could not be found between the three psychiatric groups. These findings do not support the idea that vitamin D is specifically involved in the pathophysiology of depression. The difference in patients as compared to the healthy controls might be related to a different social background resulting in differing habits e.g. of nutrition.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 3%
United States 1 1%
Poland 1 1%
Unknown 82 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 17%
Other 11 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 13%
Researcher 9 10%
Other 19 22%
Unknown 11 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 10%
Neuroscience 8 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 8%
Psychology 7 8%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 11 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,223,866
of 23,510,717 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neural Transmission
#82
of 1,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,847
of 38,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neural Transmission
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,510,717 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,807 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 38,943 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them