↓ Skip to main content

The invasive dark falsemussel Mytilopsis leucophaeata (Bivalvia: Dreissenidae): a literature review

Overview of attention for article published in Aquatic Ecology, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The invasive dark falsemussel Mytilopsis leucophaeata (Bivalvia: Dreissenidae): a literature review
Published in
Aquatic Ecology, October 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10452-010-9344-6
Authors

Victor S. Kennedy

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Mexico 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 49 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 24%
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Other 4 7%
Other 12 22%
Unknown 6 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 48%
Environmental Science 11 20%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 9 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2012.
All research outputs
#7,454,427
of 22,789,566 outputs
Outputs from Aquatic Ecology
#89
of 515 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,166
of 99,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aquatic Ecology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,566 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 515 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,008 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them