You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Validation of the Gail et al. Model of Breast Cancer Risk Prediction and Implications for Chemoprevention
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, March 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1093/jnci/93.5.358 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Beverly Rockhill, Donna Spiegelman, Celia Byrne, David J. Hunter, Graham A. Colditz |
| Abstract |
Women and their clinicians are increasingly encouraged to use risk estimates derived from statistical models, primarily that of Gail et al., to aid decision making regarding potential prevention options for breast cancer, including chemoprevention with tamoxifen. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 200 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 41 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 16 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 39 | 19% |
| Unknown | 39 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 79 | 38% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 9 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 35 | 17% |
| Unknown | 49 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2021.
All research outputs
#1,982,732
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
#1,294
of 7,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,579
of 43,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
#6
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,934 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 43,405 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.