↓ Skip to main content

Pneumolysin polymerase chain reaction for diagnosis of pneumococcal pneumonia and empyema in children

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, November 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Pneumolysin polymerase chain reaction for diagnosis of pneumococcal pneumonia and empyema in children
Published in
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, November 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10096-006-0225-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

E. Lahti, J. Mertsola, T. Kontiokari, E. Eerola, O. Ruuskanen, J. Jalava

Abstract

Streptococcus pneumoniae is the most important cause of childhood pneumonia and empyema, yet the diagnosis of pneumococcal infections by conventional methods is challenging. In this study, the clinical value of the pneumolysin-targeted real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method for the diagnosis of pneumococcal pneumonia and empyema was evaluated with 33 whole blood samples and 12 pleural fluid samples. The analytical sensitivity of the PCR assay was 4 fg of pneumococcal DNA, corresponding to two genome equivalents of pneumococcal DNA per reaction. The PCR assay correctly detected all clinical isolates of S. pneumoniae tested, whereas all nonpneumococcal bacterial organisms tested were negative by PCR. In a clinical trial, S. pneumoniae was detected by PCR in the pleural fluid of 75% of children with empyema, increasing the detection rate of pneumococcus almost tenfold that of pleural fluid culture. However, in whole blood samples, PCR detected S. pneumoniae in only one child with pneumonia and one child with pneumococcal empyema and failed to detect S. pneumoniae in three children with blood cultures positive for S. pneumoniae. The present data indicate that pneumolysin-targeted real-time PCR of pleural fluid is a valuable method for the etiologic diagnosis of pneumococcal empyema in children. The ease and rapidity of the LightCycler technology (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) make real-time PCR an applicable tool for routine diagnostics. In the evaluation of blood samples, blood culture remains the superior method for the diagnosis of bacteremic pneumococcal disease.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 4%
Estonia 1 4%
Malawi 1 4%
Unknown 21 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 33%
Student > Bachelor 4 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 4 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 42%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Sports and Recreations 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 4 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2023.
All research outputs
#7,699,921
of 23,420,064 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
#810
of 2,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,786
of 70,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,420,064 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,824 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.