↓ Skip to main content

North American montane red foxes: expansion, fragmentation, and the origin of the Sacramento Valley red fox

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Genetics, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
Title
North American montane red foxes: expansion, fragmentation, and the origin of the Sacramento Valley red fox
Published in
Conservation Genetics, June 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10592-010-0053-4
Authors

Benjamin N. Sacks, Mark J. Statham, John D. Perrine, Samantha M. Wisely, Keith B. Aubry

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Spain 1 <1%
Guatemala 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 102 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 21%
Student > Master 17 16%
Other 7 7%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 11 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 61 57%
Environmental Science 15 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 12%
Engineering 2 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 <1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 12 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2023.
All research outputs
#7,454,427
of 22,789,566 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#464
of 1,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,048
of 95,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,566 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,038 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,879 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.