↓ Skip to main content

Water Challenges for Geologic Carbon Capture and Sequestration

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Management, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
Title
Water Challenges for Geologic Carbon Capture and Sequestration
Published in
Environmental Management, February 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00267-010-9434-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robin L. Newmark, Samuel J. Friedmann, Susan A. Carroll

Abstract

Carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) has been proposed as a means to dramatically reduce greenhouse gas emissions with the continued use of fossil fuels. For geologic sequestration, the carbon dioxide is captured from large point sources (e.g., power plants or other industrial sources), transported to the injection site and injected into deep geological formations for storage. This will produce new water challenges, such as the amount of water used in energy resource development and utilization and the "capture penalty" for water use. At depth, brine displacement within formations, storage reservoir pressure increases resulting from injection, and leakage are potential concerns. Potential impacts range from increasing water demand for capture to contamination of groundwater through leakage or brine displacement. Understanding these potential impacts and the conditions under which they arise informs the design and implementation of appropriate monitoring and controls, important both for assurance of environmental safety and for accounting purposes. Potential benefits also exist, such as co-production and treatment of water to both offset reservoir pressure increase and to provide local water for beneficial use.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
Indonesia 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Ghana 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 111 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 20%
Student > Master 19 16%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Other 6 5%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 19 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 25 21%
Engineering 17 14%
Environmental Science 17 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Energy 6 5%
Other 24 20%
Unknown 26 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,603,634
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Management
#88
of 1,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,121
of 172,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Management
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,914 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,967 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.