↓ Skip to main content

Tumor growth dynamics in serially-imaged low-grade glioma patients

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuro-Oncology, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Tumor growth dynamics in serially-imaged low-grade glioma patients
Published in
Journal of Neuro-Oncology, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11060-018-2857-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chloe Gui, Suzanne E. Kosteniuk, Jonathan C. Lau, Joseph F. Megyesi

Abstract

Diffuse low-grade gliomas (LGGs) are infiltrative, slow-growing primary brain tumors that remain relatively asymptomatic for long periods of time before progressing into aggressive and fatal high-grade gliomas. We retrospectively identified LGG patients with numerous (≥ 8) serial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies. Tumor volumes were measured by manual segmentation on serial imaging to study the natural history and growth of the lesion. Patient demographic information, tumor characteristics, and histological data were collected from electronic medical records and paper charts. Out of 74 LGG patients, 10 patients (13.5%) were identified to meet the study criteria with number of MRIs acquired ranging from 8 to 18 (median, 11.5) over a median of 79.7 months (range 39.8-113.8 months). Tumor diameter increased at a median of 2.17 mm/year in a linear trajectory. Cox regression analysis revealed that initial tumor volume was an independent predictor of time to clinical intervention, and Mann-Whitney U test found that patients younger than 50 years old had significantly slower-growing tumors. Clinical intervention was more likely for tumors above a volume threshold of 73.6 mL. We retrospectively analyzed the natural history of LGGs of patients managed at a single institution with numerous serial MRI scans. Comparisons of our cohort to the literature suggest that this is a subset of particularly slow-growing and low-risk tumors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 22%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Other 4 11%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Other 8 22%
Unknown 6 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 24%
Neuroscience 4 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Computer Science 2 5%
Physics and Astronomy 2 5%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 11 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2018.
All research outputs
#12,758,973
of 23,041,514 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#1,554
of 2,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,614
of 329,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#29
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,041,514 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,989 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,292 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.