| Title |
Effect of microscopic and macroscopic discontinuities on the response of cardiac tissue to defibrillating (stimulating) currents
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, March 1986
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02443925 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
R. Plonsey, R. C. Barr |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Kenya | 1 | 8% |
| Germany | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 10 | 77% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 15% |
| Unknown | 1 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 7 | 54% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 15% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 8% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2013.
All research outputs
#5,446,629
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing
#167
of 2,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,217
of 10,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,053 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 10,062 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.