↓ Skip to main content

A manipulative field experiment to examine the effect of Capillaria hepatica (Nematoda) on wild mouse populations in southern Australia

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal for Parasitology, April 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A manipulative field experiment to examine the effect of Capillaria hepatica (Nematoda) on wild mouse populations in southern Australia
Published in
International Journal for Parasitology, April 1996
DOI 10.1016/0020-7519(96)00001-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Grant R. Singleton, Lisa K. Chambers

Abstract

A 12-month manipulative field study of the effect of a liver parasite, Capillaria hepatica, on mouse populations (Mus domesticus) was conducted in the Mallee wheatlands of northwestern Victoria. There were 2 untreated and 4 treated sites each consisting of a 16 km2 sampling zone. The parasite was released in September (spring) 1993 into an increasing mouse population which had a medium density (100-250 mice per ha). A third untreated site was monitored from January 1994. A simple but effective baiting method was developed and with the assistance of local farmers about 40,000 mice were dosed on the 4 sites; an estimated 5-7% of the population. During a second release, a month later, a further 20,000 mice were infected, boosting the level of infection to around 10%. Two months after the release approximately 30% of the population was infected. Thereafter, although there was effective transmission of the parasite, this was associated with a significant reduction in prevalence with time. The parasite reduced host survival by 5-10%, although this difference was not statistically significant, and had a minimal effect on the breeding and the rate of growth of mouse populations. Densities of 500-800 mice per ha were attained at each site in autumn 1994. Thus a spring release of the parasite into a rapidly increasing mouse population in the Victorian Mallee wheatlands did not prevent the population from increasing. The occurrence of very dry conditions following its release and the low but sustained transmission of the parasite indicate that we need to know more about factors that influence the survival and transmission of the parasite under field conditions.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 4%
Unknown 22 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 39%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Student > Master 2 9%
Professor 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 5 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 39%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 6 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2019.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Parasitology
#740
of 2,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,447
of 26,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Parasitology
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,078 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 26,762 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.