↓ Skip to main content

Genome-wide association study identifies susceptibility loci for B-cell childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Readers on

mendeley
186 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Genome-wide association study identifies susceptibility loci for B-cell childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia
Published in
Nature Communications, April 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41467-018-03178-z
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have advanced our understanding of susceptibility to B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL); however, much of the heritable risk remains unidentified. Here, we perform a GWAS and conduct a meta-analysis with two existing GWAS, totaling 2442 cases and 14,609 controls. We identify risk loci for BCP-ALL at 8q24.21 (rs28665337, P = 3.86 × 10-9, odds ratio (OR) = 1.34) and for ETV6-RUNX1 fusion-positive BCP-ALL at 2q22.3 (rs17481869, P = 3.20 × 10-8, OR = 2.14). Our findings provide further insights into genetic susceptibility to ALL and its biology.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 186 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 15%
Student > Master 18 10%
Student > Bachelor 12 6%
Professor 12 6%
Other 32 17%
Unknown 53 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 36 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 36 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 8%
Computer Science 9 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 2%
Other 17 9%
Unknown 69 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2018.
All research outputs
#4,590,684
of 23,305,591 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#32,510
of 48,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,735
of 330,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#862
of 1,202 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,305,591 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 48,182 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.2. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,011 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,202 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.