↓ Skip to main content

Offit Paul: Autism’s False Prophets: Bad Science, Risky Medicine, and the Search for a Cure

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Offit Paul: Autism’s False Prophets: Bad Science, Risky Medicine, and the Search for a Cure
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, January 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10803-008-0679-y
Authors

Roy Richard Grinker

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 11%
United States 1 11%
Unknown 7 78%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 33%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 22%
Professor 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 3 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 22%
Computer Science 1 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2010.
All research outputs
#7,926,100
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#2,861
of 5,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,331
of 175,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#14
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,800 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.