↓ Skip to main content

Factors of patellar instability: An anatomic radiographic study

Overview of attention for article published in Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, March 1994
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1632 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
457 Mendeley
Title
Factors of patellar instability: An anatomic radiographic study
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, March 1994
DOI 10.1007/bf01552649
Pubmed ID
Authors

H. Dejour, G. Walch, L. Nove‐Josserand, Ch. Guier

Abstract

We analyzed the radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scans of 143 knees operated on for symptomatic patellar instability and 67 contralateral asymptomatic knees, together with 190 control knee radiographs and 27 control knee scans, to determine the factors affecting patellar instability. Four factors were relevant in knees with symptomatic patellar instability: (1) Trochlear dysplasia (85%), as defined by the crossing sign (96%) and quantitatively expressed by the trochlear bump, pathological above 3 mm or more (66%), and the trochlear depth, pathologic at 4 mm or less. (2) Quadriceps dysplasia (83%), defined a present when the patellar tilt in extension is more than 20% on the CT scans. (3) Patella alta (Caton-Deschamps) index greater than or equal to 1.2 (24%). (4) Tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove, pathological when greater than or equal to 20 mm (56%). The factors appeared in only 3%-6.5% of the control knees. The etiology of patellar instability is multifactorial. Determination of the factors permits an effective elective therapeutic plan which aims at correcting the anomalies present.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 457 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 449 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 73 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 55 12%
Other 48 11%
Student > Postgraduate 47 10%
Student > Bachelor 42 9%
Other 103 23%
Unknown 89 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 263 58%
Engineering 19 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 2%
Sports and Recreations 7 2%
Other 23 5%
Unknown 125 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2021.
All research outputs
#2,264,169
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#204
of 3,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#562
of 21,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,006 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 21,779 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them