↓ Skip to main content

Fathead minnows use chemical cues to discriminate natural shoalmates from unfamiliar conspecifics

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Chemical Ecology, December 1994
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
Fathead minnows use chemical cues to discriminate natural shoalmates from unfamiliar conspecifics
Published in
Journal of Chemical Ecology, December 1994
DOI 10.1007/bf02033710
Pubmed ID
Authors

Grant E. Brown, R. Jan F. Smith

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Czechia 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
Unknown 44 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 31%
Researcher 9 19%
Student > Master 6 13%
Professor 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 4 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 67%
Environmental Science 5 10%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Psychology 1 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 6 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2020.
All research outputs
#7,454,427
of 22,789,566 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Chemical Ecology
#636
of 2,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,935
of 75,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Chemical Ecology
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,566 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,049 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 75,927 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.