↓ Skip to main content

Bases of political judgments: The role of stereotypic and nonstereotypic information

Overview of attention for article published in Political Behavior, March 1992
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
103 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
Bases of political judgments: The role of stereotypic and nonstereotypic information
Published in
Political Behavior, March 1992
DOI 10.1007/bf00993509
Authors

Ellen D. Riggle, Victor C. Ottati, Robert S. Wyer, James Kuklinski, Norbert Schwarz

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Switzerland 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 49 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 34%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 8 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 32 60%
Psychology 7 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 9 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2023.
All research outputs
#7,454,427
of 22,789,566 outputs
Outputs from Political Behavior
#580
of 768 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,408
of 18,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Political Behavior
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,566 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 768 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.6. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 18,759 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them