↓ Skip to main content

Choking under monitoring pressure: being watched by the experimenter reduces executive attention

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
41 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
Title
Choking under monitoring pressure: being watched by the experimenter reduces executive attention
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, February 2015
DOI 10.3758/s13423-015-0804-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Clément Belletier, Karen Davranche, Idriss S. Tellier, Florence Dumas, Franck Vidal, Thierry Hasbroucq, Pascal Huguet

Abstract

Performing more poorly given one's skill level ("choking") is likely in situations that offer an incentive if a certain outcome is achieved (outcome pressure) or when one is being watched by others-especially when one's performance is being evaluated (monitoring pressure). According to the choking literature, outcome pressure is associated with reduced executive control of attention, whereas monitoring pressure is associated with increased, yet counterproductive, attention to skill processes. Here, we show the first evidence that monitoring pressure-being watched by the experimenter-may lead individuals with higher working memory to choke on a classic measure of executive control-just the task effect thought to result from outcome pressure. Not only does this finding help refine our understanding of the processes underlying choking under monitoring pressure, but it also leads to a new look at classic audience effects, with an important implication for experimental psychology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Sweden 2 2%
Unknown 122 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 25%
Researcher 18 14%
Student > Master 13 10%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Professor 7 6%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 27 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 59 47%
Neuroscience 11 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Sports and Recreations 4 3%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 27 21%