↓ Skip to main content

Possible hidden hazards of mass vaccination against new influenza A/H1N1: have the cardiovascular risks been adequately weighed?

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Microbiology and Immunology, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#8 of 646)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
69 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Possible hidden hazards of mass vaccination against new influenza A/H1N1: have the cardiovascular risks been adequately weighed?
Published in
Medical Microbiology and Immunology, October 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00430-009-0130-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sucharit Bhakdi, Karl Lackner, Hans-Wilhelm Doerr

Abstract

Programs for vaccination against the new influenza A/H1N1 targeting many hundred million citizens in Europe and the USA are to be launched in the fall of this year. The USA is planning to employ a non-adjuvanted vaccine, whereas European nations are opting for inclusion of MF59, the adjuvant contained in an alternative seasonal flu vaccine, or the related adjuvant AS03 that is contained in a recently developed H5N1 vaccine. We draw attention to unappreciated hazards of using adjuvanted vaccine in Europe. Evidence from animal experiments in conjunction with clinical epidemiological data indicates that, quite irrespective of cause, stimulation of the immune system may accelerate atherogenesis. Application of adjuvanted flu vaccines to individuals at risk may therefore aggravate the course of underlying atherosclerotic vessel disease with all the clinical consequences. The same may hold true for other widespread diseases that are propelled by deregulated immune mechanisms. Safety trials conducted to date have not specifically taken these possible side effects into account, and unexpected serious adverse effects thus may follow in the wake of a general vaccination program. A prudent consequence would be to establish careful survey systems alongside with mass application of new adjuvanted vaccines, or to hold mass vaccination in reserve for use only in situations of true need, such as would arise with the emergence of a more virulent new H1N1 virus strain, or to use non-adjuvanted vaccines in individuals who are potentially at risk for adverse side effects.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 69 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 2 7%
Germany 1 3%
Unknown 26 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 34%
Student > Master 6 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 17%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Lecturer 1 3%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 1 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 45%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 10%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 2 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2024.
All research outputs
#761,928
of 25,744,802 outputs
Outputs from Medical Microbiology and Immunology
#8
of 646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,866
of 108,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Microbiology and Immunology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,744,802 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 646 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them