| Title |
Nannochloropsis (Eustigmatophyceae) as source of commercially valuable pigments
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Phycology, October 2000
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1008170915932 |
| Authors |
Luis M. Lubián, Olimpio Montero, Ignacio Moreno-Garrido, I. Emma Huertas, Cristina Sobrino, Manuel González-del Valle, Griselda Parés |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 367 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 2% |
| Unknown | 348 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 64 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 63 | 17% |
| Researcher | 62 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 45 | 12% |
| Other | 13 | 4% |
| Other | 43 | 12% |
| Unknown | 77 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 118 | 32% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 43 | 12% |
| Engineering | 27 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 22 | 6% |
| Chemical Engineering | 14 | 4% |
| Other | 38 | 10% |
| Unknown | 105 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2014.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Phycology
#565
of 2,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,179
of 38,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Phycology
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,624 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 38,859 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.