↓ Skip to main content

Tonic pupil, areflexia, and segmental anhidrosis: two additional cases of Ross syndrome and review of the literature

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, April 1992
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Tonic pupil, areflexia, and segmental anhidrosis: two additional cases of Ross syndrome and review of the literature
Published in
Journal of Neurology, April 1992
DOI 10.1007/bf00839146
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Weller, Helmut Wilhelm, Norbert Sommer, Johannes Dichgans, Horst Wiethölter

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 33%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 17%
Lecturer 1 17%
Student > Bachelor 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2010.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#2,117
of 4,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,465
of 18,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,964 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 18,158 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.