↓ Skip to main content

Purification and Partial Characterization of Bacillomycin L Produced by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens K103 from Lemon

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Purification and Partial Characterization of Bacillomycin L Produced by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens K103 from Lemon
Published in
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, September 2013
DOI 10.1007/s12010-013-0424-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bao Zhang, Chunjuan Dong, Qingmao Shang, Yuan Cong, Weijia Kong, Pinglan Li

Abstract

Bacillus amyloliquefaciens K103 isolated from a lemon sample was used as a biocontrol agent to suppress Rhizoctonia solani Kühn and other fungal plant pathogens. Two antifungal compounds were purified from the culture broth using acid precipitation, gel permeation chromatography, and reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry analysis indicated that the antifungal compounds were two isomers similar to bacillomycin L. One of the predominant active fractions was subjected to quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry and amino acid analysis to determine its structural characteristics, revealing that the antifungal compound with a molecular mass of 1,034.5464 was identical to bacillomycin L. This is the second report of lemon microflora producing bacillomycin L or any antifungal compound, suppressing the growth of R. solani Kühn. Meanwhile, the study provided insights into the enormous potential of food microbial resources and bacillomycin L antibiotics in biological control and sustainable agriculture.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Denmark 1 4%
Unknown 23 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 24%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Other 2 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Other 4 16%
Unknown 5 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 36%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 16%
Chemistry 3 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Engineering 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2014.
All research outputs
#7,454,427
of 22,789,566 outputs
Outputs from Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology
#540
of 2,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,810
of 202,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology
#9
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,566 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,503 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,034 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.