↓ Skip to main content

High heterogeneity within the ribosomal proteins of the Arabidopsis thaliana 80S ribosome

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Molecular Biology, March 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
112 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
High heterogeneity within the ribosomal proteins of the Arabidopsis thaliana 80S ribosome
Published in
Plant Molecular Biology, March 2005
DOI 10.1007/s11103-005-0699-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patrick Giavalisco, Daniel Wilson, Thomas Kreitler, Hans Lehrach, Joachim Klose, Johan Gobom, Paola Fucini

Abstract

Proteomic studies have addressed the composition of plant chloroplast ribosomes and 70S ribosomes from the unicellular organism Chlamydomonas reinhardtii But comprehensive characterization of cytoplasmic 80S ribosomes from higher plants has been lacking. We have used two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE) and mass spectrometry (MS) to analyse the cytoplasmic 80S ribosomes from the model flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Of the 80 ribosomal protein families predicted to comprise the cytoplasmic 80S ribosome, we have confirmed the presence of 61; specifically, 27 (84%) of the small 40S subunit and 34 (71%) of the large 60S subunit. Nearly half (45%) of the ribosomal proteins identified are represented by two or more distinct spots in the 2-DE gel indicating that these proteins are either post-translationally modified or present as different isoforms. Consistently, MS-based protein identification revealed that at least one-third (34%) of the identified ribosomal protein families showed expression of two or more family members. In addition, we have identified a number of non-ribosomal proteins that co-migrate with the plant 80S ribosomes during gradient centrifugation suggesting their possible association with the 80S ribosomes. Among them, RACK1 has recently been proposed to be a ribosome-associated protein that promotes efficient translation in yeast. The study, thus provides the basis for further investigation into the function of the other identified non-ribosomal proteins as well as the biological meaning of the various ribosomal protein isoforms.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 95 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 27%
Researcher 27 26%
Student > Master 12 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 7%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 12 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 56 55%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 24%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 <1%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 12 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2010.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Plant Molecular Biology
#1,054
of 2,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,823
of 78,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Molecular Biology
#5
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,947 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 78,985 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.