↓ Skip to main content

Reperfusion injury as a therapeutic challenge in patients with acute myocardial infarction

Overview of attention for article published in Heart Failure Reviews, May 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Reperfusion injury as a therapeutic challenge in patients with acute myocardial infarction
Published in
Heart Failure Reviews, May 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10741-007-9039-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antonio Rodríguez-Sinovas, Yaser Abdallah, Hans Michael Piper, David Garcia-Dorado

Abstract

Cardiomyocyte death secondary to transient ischemia occurs mainly during the first minutes of reperfusion, in the form of contraction band necrosis involving sarcolemmal rupture. Cardiomyocyte hypercontracture caused by re-energisation and pH recovery in the presence of impaired cytosolic Ca(2+) control as well as calpain-mediated cytoskeletal fragility play prominent roles in this type of cell death. Hypercontracture can propagate to adjacent cells through gap junctions. More recently, opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore has been shown to participate in reperfusion-induced necrosis, although its precise relation with hypercontracture has not been established. Experimental studies have convincingly demonstrated that infarct size can be markedly reduced by therapeutic interventions applied at the time of reperfusion, including contractile blockers, inhibitors of Na(+)/Ca(2+) exchange, gap junction blockers, or particulate guanylyl cyclase agonists. However, in most cases drugs for use in humans have not been developed and tested for these targets, while the effect of existing drugs with potential cardioprotective effect is not well established or understood. Research effort should be addressed to elucidate the unsolved issues of the molecular mechanisms of reperfusion-induced cell death, to identify and validate new targets and to develop appropriate drugs. The potential benefits of limiting infarct size in patients with acute myocardial infarction receiving reperfusion therapy are enormous.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 2%
Unknown 59 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Student > Master 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 9 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 12%
Engineering 5 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 7%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 10 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2013.
All research outputs
#7,454,427
of 22,789,566 outputs
Outputs from Heart Failure Reviews
#227
of 667 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,995
of 70,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heart Failure Reviews
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,566 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 667 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,968 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.