↓ Skip to main content

On the morphology and physiology of the purple and green sulphur bacteria

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Microbiology, January 1932
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
12 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
268 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
On the morphology and physiology of the purple and green sulphur bacteria
Published in
Archives of Microbiology, January 1932
DOI 10.1007/bf00454965
Authors

C. B. van Niel

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 19%
Researcher 9 15%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Student > Master 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 13 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 14%
Chemistry 5 8%
Chemical Engineering 4 7%
Physics and Astronomy 3 5%
Other 12 20%
Unknown 15 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2023.
All research outputs
#8,457,691
of 25,246,334 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Microbiology
#631
of 3,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124
of 2,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Microbiology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,246,334 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,112 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 2,760 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them