↓ Skip to main content

Diversity of secondary endosymbiont-derived actin-coding genes in cryptomonads and their evolutionary implications

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Plant Research, March 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Diversity of secondary endosymbiont-derived actin-coding genes in cryptomonads and their evolutionary implications
Published in
Journal of Plant Research, March 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10265-006-0263-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Goro Tanifuji, Mayumi Erata, Ken-ichiro Ishida, Naoko Onodera, Yoshiaki Hara

Abstract

In the secondary endosymbiotic organisms of cryptomonads, the symbiont actin genes have been found together with the host one. To examine whether they are commonly conserved and where they are encoded, host and symbiont actin genes from Pyrenomonas helgolandii were isolated, and their specific and homologous regions were digoxigenin (DIG) labeled separately. Using these probes, Southern hybridization was performed on 13 species of cryptomonads. They were divided into three groups: (1) both host and symbiont actin gene signals were detected, (2) only the host actin gene signal was detected, and (3) host and unknown actin signals were detected. The phylogenetic analysis of these actin gene sequences indicated that the evolutionary rates of the symbiont actin genes were accelerated more than those of the hosts. The unknown actin signals were recognized as the highly diverged symbiont actin genes. One of the diverged symbiont actin sequences from Guillardia theta is presumed to be as a pseudogene or to its precursor. Southern hybridizations based on the samples divided by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis showed that all actin genes were encoded by the host nuclei. These results possibly represent the evolutionary fate of the symbiont actin gene in cryptomonads, which was firstly transferred from the symbiont nucleus or nucleomorph, to the host nucleus and became a pseudogene and then finally disappeared there.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 11%
Unknown 8 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 33%
Professor 2 22%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Unknown 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 22%
Environmental Science 1 11%
Chemistry 1 11%
Unknown 1 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2013.
All research outputs
#7,454,427
of 22,789,566 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Plant Research
#196
of 828 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,229
of 66,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Plant Research
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,566 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 828 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,231 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them