↓ Skip to main content

Anabolic effect of genistein and genistin on bone metabolism in the femoral-metaphyseal tissues of elderly rats: The genistein effect is enhanced by zinc

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, January 1998
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Anabolic effect of genistein and genistin on bone metabolism in the femoral-metaphyseal tissues of elderly rats: The genistein effect is enhanced by zinc
Published in
Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, January 1998
DOI 10.1023/a:1006809031836
Pubmed ID
Authors

Masayoshi Yamaguchi, Ying Hua Gao

Abstract

The effect of genistein and genistin on bone components in the femoral-metaphyseal tissues obtained from elderly female rats was investigated in vitro. The metaphyseal tissues were cultured for 24 h in a medium containing either vehicle, genistein (10(-8)-10(-5) M) or genistin (10(-7)-10(-5) M). The presence of genistein or genistin caused a significant increase in alkaline phosphatase activity, deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and calcium contents in the metaphyseal tissues. The effect of genistein was greater than that of genistin. The bone components increased by genistein (10(-5) M) or genistin (10(-5) M) were completely blocked by the presence of cycloheximide (10(-6) M). The presence of zinc sulfate (10(-5) M) caused a significant increase in the genistein (10(-5) M)-elevated alkaline phosphatase activity, DNA and calcium contents. The enhancement with zinc was not seen by genistin (10(-5) M). The stimulatory effect of zinc on the genistein-induced increase in bone components of the metaphyseal tissues was completely blocked by the presence of cycloheximide (10(-6) M). The present results suggest that genistein and genistin have an anabolic effect on bone metabolism in the femoral-metaphyseal tissues of elderly rats, and that the genistein effect is enhanced by zinc, an essential trace element.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 33%
Professor 2 22%
Student > Master 2 22%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 11%
Unknown 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 22%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 11%
Neuroscience 1 11%
Chemistry 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Unknown 2 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2014.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry
#481
of 2,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,753
of 94,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,447 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,808 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.