↓ Skip to main content

Leucoanthocyanidins as intermediates in anthocyanidin biosynthesis in flowers of Matthiola incana R. Br.

Overview of attention for article published in Planta, February 1985
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
12 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Leucoanthocyanidins as intermediates in anthocyanidin biosynthesis in flowers of Matthiola incana R. Br.
Published in
Planta, February 1985
DOI 10.1007/bf00393505
Pubmed ID
Authors

Werner Heller, Lothar Britsch, Gert Forkmann, Hans Grisebach

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 4%
Unknown 26 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 19%
Student > Bachelor 5 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 7 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 19%
Chemistry 4 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 7 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2024.
All research outputs
#7,756,853
of 23,578,918 outputs
Outputs from Planta
#627
of 2,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,336
of 39,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Planta
#9
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,578,918 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,787 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 39,125 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.