↓ Skip to main content

Aqualite, a new mineral species of the eudialyte group from the Inagli alkaline pluton, Sakha-Yakutia, Russia, and the problem of oxonium in hydrated eudialytes

Overview of attention for article published in Geology of Ore Deposits, December 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Aqualite, a new mineral species of the eudialyte group from the Inagli alkaline pluton, Sakha-Yakutia, Russia, and the problem of oxonium in hydrated eudialytes
Published in
Geology of Ore Deposits, December 2007
DOI 10.1134/s1075701507080089
Authors

A. P. Khomyakov, G. N. Nechelyustov, R. K. Rastsvetaeva

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 17%
Unknown 5 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 67%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 17%
Professor 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 83%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2014.
All research outputs
#7,454,427
of 22,789,566 outputs
Outputs from Geology of Ore Deposits
#5
of 38 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,305
of 156,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geology of Ore Deposits
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,566 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 38 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one scored the same or higher as 33 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,593 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them