↓ Skip to main content

Advances in Treatment of Cardiac Amyloid

Overview of attention for article published in Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Advances in Treatment of Cardiac Amyloid
Published in
Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11936-018-0631-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cherie N. Dahm, R. Frank Cornell, Daniel J. Lenihan

Abstract

Systemic amyloidosis represents a complex group of diseases with a common feature characterized by misfolded autologous proteins depositing into tissues or organs throughout the body. Light chain amyloidosis (AL) and transthyretin (TTR) amyloid are the two most prevalent forms of this disease that commonly results in cardiac amyloidosis. In both of these conditions, the myocardium is a frequent site of infiltration and end-organ involvement often with devastating consequences. With cardiac amyloidosis becoming an increasingly identified disease that has previously been under-recognized, the purpose of this comprehensive review is to focus on the diagnosis and treatment of these two types of cardiac amyloidosis including a contemporary update on currently available therapies being investigated in clinical trials. Subsequently, we will detail potential therapeutic efficacy and limitations of these regimens, and then complete the review by highlighting newer treatment modalities. A high-level overview of modern therapeutic approaches for AL amyloid includes targeted therapies directed at reducing the production of precursor proteins and inhibitors intended to limit the deposition of fibrils in tissues. In the case of TTR amyloid, current therapy is focused on stabilization of TTR proteins, suppression of protein formation, and blocking the deposition of amyloid fibrils in tissue. Novel therapies are focused on removing amyloid fibril deposition from affected tissues. In summary, cardiac amyloidosis is a progressively devastating disease requiring swift recognition and treatment now with groundbreaking therapies on the horizon.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 15%
Other 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 8 24%
Unknown 9 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 48%
Neuroscience 3 9%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 9 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2018.
All research outputs
#15,504,780
of 23,041,514 outputs
Outputs from Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine
#287
of 416 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,700
of 328,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine
#15
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,041,514 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 416 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,950 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.