↓ Skip to main content

Current Status of Vaccines for Schistosomiasis

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Microbiology Reviews, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
393 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
340 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Current Status of Vaccines for Schistosomiasis
Published in
Clinical Microbiology Reviews, January 2008
DOI 10.1128/cmr.00046-07
Pubmed ID
Authors

Donald P. McManus, Alex Loukas

Abstract

Schistosomiasis, caused by trematode blood flukes of the genus Schistosoma, is recognized as the most important human helminth infection in terms of morbidity and mortality. Infection follows direct contact with freshwater harboring free-swimming larval (cercaria) forms of the parasite. Despite the existence of the highly effective antischistosome drug praziquantel (PZQ), schistosomiasis is spreading into new areas, and although it is the cornerstone of current control programs, PZQ chemotherapy does have limitations. In particular, mass treatment does not prevent reinfection. Furthermore, there is increasing concern about the development of parasite resistance to PZQ. Consequently, vaccine strategies represent an essential component for the future control of schistosomiasis as an adjunct to chemotherapy. An improved understanding of the immune response to schistosome infection, both in animal models and in humans, suggests that development of a vaccine may be possible. This review considers aspects of antischistosome protective immunity that are important in the context of vaccine development. The current status in the development of vaccines against the African (Schistosoma mansoni and S. haematobium) and Asian (S. japonicum) schistosomes is then discussed, as are new approaches that may improve the efficacy of available vaccines and aid in the identification of new targets for immune attack.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 340 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Sudan 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 322 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 70 21%
Student > Master 60 18%
Student > Bachelor 58 17%
Researcher 32 9%
Other 15 4%
Other 57 17%
Unknown 48 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 115 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 52 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 41 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 28 8%
Chemistry 10 3%
Other 40 12%
Unknown 54 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2023.
All research outputs
#2,863,573
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Microbiology Reviews
#530
of 1,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,984
of 166,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Microbiology Reviews
#6
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,158 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.