↓ Skip to main content

Morphology and developmental rate of blowflies Chrysomya megacephala and Chrysomya rufifacies in Thailand: application in forensic entomology

Overview of attention for article published in Parasitology Research, February 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
Title
Morphology and developmental rate of blowflies Chrysomya megacephala and Chrysomya rufifacies in Thailand: application in forensic entomology
Published in
Parasitology Research, February 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00436-008-0895-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kom Sukontason, Somsak Piangjai, Sirisuda Siriwattanarungsee, Kabkaew L. Sukontason

Abstract

The larval morphology and developmental rate of Chrysomya megacephala (F.) and Chrysomya rufifacies (Macquart), the two most forensically important blowfly species in Thailand, are presented. Morphological comparison of the third instar of both species revealed different characteristics (e.g., body appearance, cephalopharyngeal skeleton, dorsal cuticular spines between the prothorax and mesothorax, and feature of the posterior spiracle), thereby, allowing correct identification. A data analysis was conducted in Chiang Mai province, Northern Thailand during 2000-2001 on the developmental rate of both flies under natural ambient temperature and a natural light-dark photoperiod. The results indicated that larvae of C. megacephala developed more rapidly in April, pupariation initiated at 84 h at temperatures averaging 31.4 degrees C, and the larvae grew slower in the rainy season and winter. Similarly, rapid development of C. rufifacies larvae appeared in the summer, with a pupariation period as short as 96 h in June (average temperature 27.4 degrees C). Analysis of the median body length of C. megacephala and C. rufifacies larvae in different seasons of the years 2000-2001 in Thailand revealed that both species developed rapidly in the summer; pupariation of C. rufifacies initiated at 144 h, while C. megacephala initiated pupariation at 156 h. This information is potentially useful for estimating the postmortem interval of a corpse in forensic investigations, where the corpse becomes infesting with these fly species.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
Malaysia 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
South Africa 1 <1%
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Unknown 108 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 18%
Student > Bachelor 19 16%
Student > Master 16 13%
Researcher 8 7%
Student > Postgraduate 8 7%
Other 22 18%
Unknown 25 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 63 53%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 3%
Chemistry 4 3%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 30 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2023.
All research outputs
#7,729,343
of 23,505,669 outputs
Outputs from Parasitology Research
#647
of 3,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,911
of 160,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasitology Research
#4
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,505,669 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,835 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.