↓ Skip to main content

Determinants of vitamin D status in older women living in a subtropical climate

Overview of attention for article published in Osteoporosis International, July 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
109 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
Determinants of vitamin D status in older women living in a subtropical climate
Published in
Osteoporosis International, July 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00198-005-1888-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jenny A. Lucas, Mark J. Bolland, Andrew B. Grey, Ruth W. Ames, Barbara H. Mason, Anne M. Horne, Greg D. Gamble, Ian R. Reid

Abstract

Studies performed in the Northern Hemisphere and in areas distant from the equator have demonstrated significant seasonal variation in 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) levels. Whether such variation occurs in a subtropical area such as Australasia is not clear. We performed a cross-sectional study of 1,606 healthy, postmenopausal women recruited over a 33-month period. The study had three goals: to determine the normal levels of 25OHD in healthy postmenopausal women living in Auckland, New Zealand; to determine whether seasonal variation of 25OHD occurs at this latitude; to assess the relationship between 25OHD, biochemical indices, anthropometric variables and bone mineral density (BMD). We found significant seasonal variation in 25OHD levels, with the change in monthly ultraviolet dose from summer to winter being followed 6-8 weeks later by a corresponding change in 25OHD levels. Vitamin D insufficiency (25OHD <50 nmol/l) was common. During summer, 28-58% of participants had suboptimal vitamin D status, while in winter, the frequency increased to 56-74%. 25OHD levels correlated with participants' age (r=-0.15), weight (r=-0.11), body mass index (r=-0.13), fat mass (r=-0.14), percentage body fat (r=-0.16), physical activity (r=0.10) and the month of blood sampling (all P<0.0001). Collectively, age, fat mass, physical activity, and month of sampling explained 21% of the variance in 25OHD. No significant relationships were noted between 25OHD and BMD at any site. Other variables that showed significant monthly variation were glucose (P=0.002), serum phosphate, alkaline phosphatase, and albumin (all P<0.0001). There was no monthly variation in BMD at the lumbar spine or proximal femur. In conclusion, there is significant seasonal variation in 25OHD levels, even in a subtropical climate. Furthermore, despite generous amounts of sunlight, considerable numbers of women have suboptimal vitamin D status, even in summer. Our findings support the suggestion that vitamin D supplementation should become standard practice in this population of women, particularly during winter.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ireland 1 2%
Unknown 49 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Student > Master 6 12%
Lecturer 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Other 11 22%
Unknown 8 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 12 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2017.
All research outputs
#4,696,781
of 22,789,566 outputs
Outputs from Osteoporosis International
#783
of 3,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,391
of 57,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Osteoporosis International
#3
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,566 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,607 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,314 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.