↓ Skip to main content

Social Networks and Community Prevention Coalitions

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Prevention, July 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Social Networks and Community Prevention Coalitions
Published in
Journal of Prevention, July 2005
DOI 10.1007/s10935-005-5390-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark E. Feinberg, Nathaniel R. Riggs, Mark T. Greenberg

Abstract

This study investigates the links between community readiness and the social networks among participants in Communities That Care (CTC), community-based prevention coalitions. The coalitions targeted adolescent behavior problems through community risk factor assessments, prioritization of risk factors, and selection/implementation of corresponding evidence-based family, school, and community programs. Key leaders (n = 219) in 23 new CTC sites completed questionnaires focusing on community readiness to implement CTC and the respondents' personal, work, and social organization links to other key leaders in the community. Outside technical assistants also completed ratings of each community's readiness and early CTC functioning. Measures of network cohesion/integration were positively associated with readiness, while centralization was negatively associated. These results suggest that non-centralized networks in which ties between members are close and direct may be an indicator of community readiness. In addition, we found different associations between readiness and different domains of social relations. EDITORS' STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS: The authors present the promising practice of using social network analysis to characterize the functioning of local prevention coalitions and their readiness to implement a community-based prevention initiative. Researchers and community planners will benefit from the lessons in this article, which capitalizes on a large sample and multiple informants. This work raises interesting questions about how to combine the promotion of coalition functioning while simultaneously encouraging diversity of coalition membership.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 5%
Chile 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 83 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 11%
Student > Master 10 11%
Other 19 21%
Unknown 15 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 28 30%
Psychology 19 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 10%
Engineering 2 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 26 28%