| Title |
Issues in Disseminating and Replicating Effective Prevention Programs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Prevention Science, March 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1023/b:prev.0000013981.28071.52 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Delbert S. Elliott, Sharon Mihalic |
| Abstract |
The new frontier for prevention research involves building a scientific knowledge base on how to disseminate and implement effective prevention programs with fidelity. Toward this end, a brief overview of findings from the Blueprints for Violence Prevention-Replication Initiative is presented, identifying factors that enhance or impede a successful implementation of these programs. Findings are organized around five implementation tasks: site selection, training, technical assistance, fidelity, and sustainability. Overall, careful attention to each of these tasks, together with an independent monitoring of fidelity, produced a successful implementation with high fidelity and sustainability. A discussion of how these findings inform the present local adaptation-fidelity debate follows. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 332 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 309 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 63 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 55 | 17% |
| Researcher | 49 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 37 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 18 | 5% |
| Other | 66 | 20% |
| Unknown | 44 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 108 | 33% |
| Psychology | 90 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 5% |
| Unknown | 60 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,735,483
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Prevention Science
#96
of 1,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,210
of 63,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Prevention Science
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 63,046 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.