↓ Skip to main content

Balancing immunity and pathology in visceral leishmaniasis

Overview of attention for article published in Immunology & Cell Biology, December 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
196 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
219 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Balancing immunity and pathology in visceral leishmaniasis
Published in
Immunology & Cell Biology, December 2006
DOI 10.1038/sj.icb7100011
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amanda C Stanley, Christian R Engwerda

Abstract

Experimental visceral leishmaniasis (VL) caused by infection with Leishmania donovani results in the development of organ-specific immunity in the two main target tissues of infection, the spleen and the liver. The liver is the site of an acute resolving infection associated with the development of inflammatory granulomas around infected Kupffer cells, and resistance to reinfection. Paradoxically, the spleen is an initial site for the generation of cell-mediated immune responses, but ultimately becomes a site of parasite persistence with associated immunopathological changes. These include splenomegaly and a breakdown in tissue architecture that is postulated to contribute to the immunocompromized status of the host. The progressive development of splenic pathology is largely associated with high levels of TNF and interleukin (IL)-10. Follicular dendritic cell (DC) networks are lost, whereas TNF mediates the destruction of marginal zone macrophages and gp38(+) stromal cells, and IL-10 promotes impaired DC migration into T-cell areas with consequent ineffective T-cell priming. Splenic stromal cell function is also altered, promoting the selective development of IL-10-producing DC with immunoregulatory properties. Ultimately, a fine immunological balance determines responses that effectively promote parasite clearance in the liver and those that promote pathology in the spleen, and future investigation aims to separate these responses to offer further means of parasite control in chronically infected VL patients.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 209 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 24%
Student > Master 45 21%
Researcher 27 12%
Student > Bachelor 21 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Other 37 17%
Unknown 22 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 67 31%
Immunology and Microbiology 32 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 11%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 8 4%
Other 25 11%
Unknown 34 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2020.
All research outputs
#8,543,833
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Immunology & Cell Biology
#847
of 1,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,878
of 168,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Immunology & Cell Biology
#8
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,849 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,765 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.