↓ Skip to main content

Cell cycle checkpoint defects contribute to genomic instability in PTEN deficient cells independent of DNA DSB repair

Overview of attention for article published in Cell Cycle, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cell cycle checkpoint defects contribute to genomic instability in PTEN deficient cells independent of DNA DSB repair
Published in
Cell Cycle, October 2014
DOI 10.4161/cc.8.14.8947
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arun Gupta, Qin Yang, Raj K Pandita, Clayton R Hunt, Tao Xiang, Sandeep Misri, Sicong Zeng, Julia Pagan, Jessei Jeffery, Janusz Puc, Rakesh Kumar, Zhihui Feng, Simon N Powell, Audesh Bhat, Tomoko Yaguchi, Renu Wadhwa, Sunil C Kaul, Ramon Parsons, Kum Kum Khanna, Tej K Pandita

Abstract

Chromosomes in PTEN deficient cells display both numerical as well as structural alterations including regional amplification. We found that PTEN deficient cells displayed a normal DNA damage response (DDR) as evidenced by the ionizing radiation (IR)-induced phosphorylation of Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated (ATM) as well as its effectors. PTEN deficient cells also had no defect in Rad51 expression or DNA damage repair kinetics post irradiation. In contrast, caffeine treatment specifically increased IR-induced chromosome aberrations and mitotic index only in cells with PTEN, and not in cells deficient for PTEN, suggesting that their checkpoints were defective. Furthermore, PTEN-deficient cells were unable to maintain active spindle checkpoint after taxol treatment. Genomic instability in PTEN deficient cells could not be attributed to lack of PTEN at centromeres, since no interaction was detected between centromeric DNA and PTEN in wild type cells. These results indicate that PTEN deficiency alters multiple cell cycle checkpoints possibly leaving less time for DNA damage repair and/or chromosome segregation as evidenced by the increased structural as well as numerical alterations seen in PTEN deficient cells.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 68 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 26%
Researcher 17 23%
Student > Bachelor 12 16%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 6 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Social Sciences 1 1%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 9 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2016.
All research outputs
#7,454,427
of 22,789,566 outputs
Outputs from Cell Cycle
#835
of 3,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,554
of 260,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Cycle
#401
of 1,251 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,566 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,684 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,449 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,251 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.