| Title |
A New Characterization of Semi-bent and Bent Functions on Finite Fields*
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Designs, Codes and Cryptography, February 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10623-005-6345-x |
| Authors |
Khoongming Khoo, Guang Gong, Douglas R. Stinson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 33% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 33% |
| Researcher | 1 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematics | 2 | 67% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2010.
All research outputs
#7,917,073
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Designs, Codes and Cryptography
#44
of 267 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,060
of 158,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Designs, Codes and Cryptography
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 267 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,969 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.