| Title |
A comparison between ITS phylogenetic relationships and morphological species recognition within Mycena sect. Calodontes in Northern Europe
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Mycological Progress, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11557-009-0648-7 |
| Authors |
Christoffer Bugge Harder, Thomas Læssøe, Rasmus Kjøller, Tobias G. Frøslev |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Philippines | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 30 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 24% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 21% |
| Unknown | 6 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 65% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 12% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 6 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2017.
All research outputs
#7,454,427
of 22,789,566 outputs
Outputs from Mycological Progress
#169
of 541 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,531
of 164,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mycological Progress
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,566 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 541 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.