| Title |
History and significance of rapid automatized naming
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Dyslexia, December 1999
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11881-999-0018-9 |
| Authors |
Martha Bridge Denckla, Laurie E. Cutting |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 133 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 21% |
| Researcher | 20 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 33 | 23% |
| Unknown | 20 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 68 | 48% |
| Linguistics | 14 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Unknown | 29 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2015.
All research outputs
#6,949,806
of 22,789,566 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Dyslexia
#77
of 247 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,794
of 105,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Dyslexia
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,566 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 247 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,779 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.