You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Phonological awareness and rapid automatized naming predicting early development in reading and spelling: Results from a cross-linguistic longitudinal study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Learning & Individual Differences, February 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.lindif.2010.10.005 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bjarte Furnes, Stefan Samuelsson |
| Abstract |
In this study, the relationship between latent constructs of phonological awareness (PA) and rapid automatized naming (RAN) were investigated and related to later measures of reading and spelling in children learning to read in different alphabetic writing systems (i.e., Norwegian/Swedish vs. English). 750 U.S./Australian children and 230 Scandinavian children were followed longitudinally between kindergarten and 2nd grade. PA and RAN were measured in kindergarten and Grade 1, while word recognition, phonological decoding, and spelling were measured in kindergarten, Grade 1, and Grade 2. In general, high stability was observed for the various reading and spelling measures, such that little additional variance was left open for PA and RAN. However, results demonstrated that RAN was more related to reading than spelling across orthographies, with the opposite pattern shown for PA. In addition, tests of measurement invariance show that the factor loadings of each observed indicator on the latent PA factor was the same across U.S./Australia and Scandinavia. Similar findings were obtained for RAN. In general, tests of structural invariance show that models of early literacy development are highly transferable across languages. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Uruguay | 2 | 1% |
| Sweden | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 187 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 45 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 41 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 10% |
| Researcher | 16 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 29 | 15% |
| Unknown | 33 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 76 | 39% |
| Social Sciences | 32 | 16% |
| Linguistics | 23 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 21 | 11% |
| Unknown | 34 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2012.
All research outputs
#8,642,802
of 25,643,886 outputs
Outputs from Learning & Individual Differences
#375
of 985 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,503
of 194,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Learning & Individual Differences
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,643,886 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 985 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,807 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.