| Title |
Non-existence de certains, polygones généralisés, I
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Inventiones mathematicae, December 1976
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf01390013 |
| Authors |
J. Tits |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 1 | 33% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 33% |
| Researcher | 1 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematics | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2011.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Inventiones mathematicae
#203
of 1,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,611
of 23,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Inventiones mathematicae
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,124 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 23,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.