↓ Skip to main content

Heinrich Hencky: a rheological pioneer

Overview of attention for article published in Rheologica Acta, August 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Heinrich Hencky: a rheological pioneer
Published in
Rheologica Acta, August 2002
DOI 10.1007/s00397-002-0259-6
Authors

Roger I. Tanner, Elizabeth Tanner

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 5%
United States 1 5%
Poland 1 5%
Unknown 19 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 36%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 18%
Researcher 3 14%
Professor 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 8 36%
Chemistry 3 14%
Chemical Engineering 1 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 5%
Computer Science 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 6 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2021.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Rheologica Acta
#79
of 359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,705
of 48,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rheologica Acta
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 359 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 48,115 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them