↓ Skip to main content

The Relative Importance of Physician Communication, Participatory Decision Making, and Patient Understanding in Diabetes Self‐management

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, April 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
534 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
457 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The Relative Importance of Physician Communication, Participatory Decision Making, and Patient Understanding in Diabetes Self‐management
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, April 2002
DOI 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10905.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michele Heisler, Reynard R. Bouknight, Rodney A. Hayward, Dylan M. Smith, Eve A. Kerr

Abstract

Patients' self-management practices have substantial consequences on morbidity and mortality in diabetes. While the quality of patient-physician relations has been associated with improved health outcomes and functional status, little is known about the impact of different patient-physician interaction styles on patients' diabetes self-management. This study assessed the influence of patients' evaluation of their physicians' participatory decision-making style, rating of physician communication, and reported understanding of diabetes self-care on their self-reported diabetes management. We surveyed 2,000 patients receiving diabetes care across 25 Veterans' Affairs facilities. We measured patients' evaluation of provider participatory decision making with a 4-item scale (Provider Participatory Decision-making Style [PDMstyle]; alpha = 0.96), rating of providers' communication with a 5-item scale (Provider Communication [PCOM]; alpha = 0.93), understanding of diabetes self-care with an 8-item scale (alpha = 0.90), and patients' completion of diabetes self-care activities (self-management) in 5 domains (alpha = 0.68). Using multivariable linear regression, we examined self-management with the independent associations of PDMstyle, PCOM, and Understanding. Sixty-six percent of the sample completed the surveys (N = 1,314). Higher ratings in PDMstyle and PCOM were each associated with higher self-management assessments (P < .01 in all models). When modeled together, PCOM remained a significant independent predictor of self-management (standardized beta: 0.18; P < .001), but PDMstyle became nonsignificant. Adding Understanding to the model diminished the unique effect of PCOM in predicting self-management (standardized beta: 0.10; P =.004). Understanding was strongly and independently associated with self-management (standardized beta: 0.25; P < .001). For these patients, ratings of providers' communication effectiveness were more important than a participatory decision-making style in predicting diabetes self-management. Reported understanding of self-care behaviors was highly predictive of and attenuated the effect of both PDMstyle and PCOM on self-management, raising the possibility that both provider styles enhance self-management through increased patient understanding or self-confidence.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 457 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 2%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 5 1%
Unknown 433 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 79 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 69 15%
Researcher 59 13%
Student > Bachelor 44 10%
Other 29 6%
Other 110 24%
Unknown 67 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 143 31%
Social Sciences 46 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 44 10%
Psychology 39 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 21 5%
Other 76 17%
Unknown 88 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,352,713
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#1,057
of 8,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,290
of 128,884 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,256 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,884 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.