↓ Skip to main content

The Monte Carlo method

Overview of attention for article published in Astrophysics and Space Science, November 1971
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
165 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
The Monte Carlo method
Published in
Astrophysics and Space Science, November 1971
DOI 10.1007/bf00649201
Authors

M. Hénon

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
Unknown 25 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 31%
Researcher 5 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 6 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 9 35%
Engineering 4 15%
Computer Science 2 8%
Mathematics 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 6 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2014.
All research outputs
#7,916,538
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Astrophysics and Space Science
#438
of 2,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#783
of 3,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Astrophysics and Space Science
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,276 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 3,624 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them