↓ Skip to main content

Reevaluating the potency of the memory conformity effect

Overview of attention for article published in Memory & Cognition, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Reevaluating the potency of the memory conformity effect
Published in
Memory & Cognition, December 2009
DOI 10.3758/mc.37.8.1069
Pubmed ID
Authors

Glen E. Bodner, Elisabeth Musch, Tanjeem Azad

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 47 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 29%
Student > Bachelor 9 18%
Student > Master 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 6%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 7 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 30 61%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 6 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2020.
All research outputs
#7,454,427
of 22,789,566 outputs
Outputs from Memory & Cognition
#491
of 1,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,334
of 165,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Memory & Cognition
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,566 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,569 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,289 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.