↓ Skip to main content

Nanoscale Devices

Overview of attention for book
Overall attention for this book and its chapters
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nanoscale Devices
Published by
ADS, August 2009
DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-92732-7
ISBNs
978-3-54-092731-0, 978-3-54-092732-7
Authors

Cerofolini, Gianfranco

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 67%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 33%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 22%
Professor 2 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 5 56%
Chemistry 3 33%
Engineering 2 22%
Materials Science 2 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2020.
All research outputs
#7,553,524
of 23,041,514 outputs
Outputs from ADS
#9,313
of 37,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,859
of 93,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ADS
#119
of 402 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,041,514 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 37,451 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,026 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 402 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.