| Title |
Mammals from the Late Jurassic Qigu Formation in the Southern Junggar Basin, Xinjiang, Northwest China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments, July 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12549-010-0030-4 |
| Authors |
Thomas Martin, Alexander O. Averianov, Hans-Ulrich Pfretzschner |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 26% |
| Researcher | 8 | 19% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 22 | 51% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 21% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 10 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2022.
All research outputs
#7,531,132
of 22,979,862 outputs
Outputs from Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments
#121
of 325 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,136
of 95,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,979,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 325 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,488 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.