↓ Skip to main content

Neogene phasianids (Aves: Phasianidae) of Central Asia: 3. Genera Lophogallus gen. nov. and Syrmaticus

Overview of attention for article published in Paleontological Journal, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Neogene phasianids (Aves: Phasianidae) of Central Asia: 3. Genera Lophogallus gen. nov. and Syrmaticus
Published in
Paleontological Journal, June 2010
DOI 10.1134/s0031030110030135
Authors

N. V. Zelenkov, E. N. Kurochkin

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 10%
Unknown 9 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 20%
Other 1 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Student > Master 1 10%
Researcher 1 10%
Other 2 20%
Unknown 2 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 50%
Environmental Science 1 10%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 10%
Unknown 3 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2023.
All research outputs
#7,749,471
of 23,563,389 outputs
Outputs from Paleontological Journal
#147
of 869 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,886
of 97,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Paleontological Journal
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,563,389 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 869 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them