↓ Skip to main content

Environmental and hydrogeological problems in karstic terrains crossed by tunnels: a case study

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Geology, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Environmental and hydrogeological problems in karstic terrains crossed by tunnels: a case study
Published in
Environmental Geology, October 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00254-008-1609-1
Authors

J. Gisbert, A. Vallejos, A. González, A. Pulido-Bosch

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 27%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 14%
Other 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Other 4 18%
Unknown 6 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 6 27%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 18%
Engineering 4 18%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Unknown 7 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2023.
All research outputs
#7,454,427
of 22,789,566 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Geology
#67
of 357 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,465
of 91,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Geology
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,566 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 357 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.