↓ Skip to main content

Maternal transfer of organohalogenated compounds in sharks and stingrays

Overview of attention for article published in Marine Pollution Bulletin, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Maternal transfer of organohalogenated compounds in sharks and stingrays
Published in
Marine Pollution Bulletin, January 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.12.056
Pubmed ID
Authors

Liesbeth Weijs, Nathalie Briels, Douglas H. Adams, Gilles Lepoint, Krishna Das, Ronny Blust, Adrian Covaci

Abstract

Elasmobranchs can bioaccumulate considerable amounts of persistent organic pollutants (POPs) and utilize several reproductive strategies thereby influencing maternal transfer of contaminants. This study provides preliminary data on the POP transfer from pregnant females to offspring of three species (Atlantic stingrays, bonnethead, blacktip sharks) with different reproduction modes (aplacental, placental viviparity). Polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) levels were generally higher than any other POPs. Stingrays and blacktip shark embryos contained the lowest POP concentrations while bonnetheads and the blacktip adult female had the highest concentrations. Results suggest that are more readily transferred from the mother to the embryo compared to what is transferred to ova in stingrays. Statistically significant differences in levels of selected POPs were found between embryos from the left and right uterus within the same litter as well as between female and male embryos within the same litter for bonnetheads, but not for the blacktip sharks.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 2 3%
Unknown 67 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 22%
Student > Bachelor 12 17%
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 14 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 41%
Environmental Science 17 25%
Chemistry 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 12 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2016.
All research outputs
#4,127,383
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Marine Pollution Bulletin
#1,492
of 9,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,278
of 360,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Pollution Bulletin
#14
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,588 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.